Tuesday, 23 June 2009

Fletcher vs Mascherano

It's slow season, so I'll keep this ticking over my putting up modified versions of posts from some online debates I take part in.


This article is discussing the two players mentioned in the title, their form and so on. The basic point was fans of Liverpool suggesting that Fletcher isn't as good a player as Mascherano. When I say "you" it's in direct reply to Liverpool fans that I was having this little tête-à-tête with. Their opinions should be clear from my replies.

------------

You say Mascherano is a superior player than Fletcher, yet performances on the park say otherwise. You're so totally caught up in the spell of having an exotic name with a big reputation that you automically propel him above a player who's been a bit part player for us with a terrible reputation as a make-weight only surviving at the club because he shares the manager's nationality. Open your eyes, look past that and see what they do on the pitch. You take the typical, moronic football fan opinion that once a reputation is forged, it can't be changed. Fletcher is a lesser player and can NEVER change that. It isn't like players can improve, eh?

In the last two full seasons, Fletcher has been better than Mascherano, even thought two years ago Fletcher played much fewer games he was always excellent when he played. Mascherano had a storming run at the end of the 06/07 season when he first arrived but hasn't built on that to have any claim to be truly world class.

As a break up guy, superb. Always has been. One of the best in the business and in that role alone is a better player than Fletcher. It's a shame for the Argentine that that's all he brings to Liverpool. He doesn't link up midfield. He doesn't read the attacking side of the game. He offers nothing beyond the half way line.

I find it hilarious that you have the temerity to accuse me of bias when you are the one putting a media built reputation (Argentine captain, Maradona loves him, must be superb) over performances. Note that at no stage am I saying that Mascherano is a poor player. I'm saying that he hasn't been as good as Fletcher in the last two seasons, especially the one just finished and that he doesn't offer enough in his overall game to be considered world class.

Put your woe-is-me attitude to one sided and drop the bias line. I'm never biased in these regards. I'd take Torres in a heartbeat. Alonso made Carrick look average this season.

Tell you want, mind. Kleberson's better than Gerrard. WC winners medal, experience in other leagues and more than any of that... he's got a Brazilian name and so must be better. Viva la extranjero.


-------

This second one is a later reply, posted after a few more people had commented on how Fletcher was definitely not as good a player as Mascherano with no actual discussion of the players.

I judge players on their performances. Fletcher's have been better in the past year, if not two.

The media tells you that Mascherano is a world class player, captain of Argentina and affords him all the wonder and grandeur of being foreign (ie. exotic and thus better in their eyes). Fletcher is still too boring for the media. An unassuming Scottish lad who goes about things quietly and who has, as you have said, only benefitted in terms of appearances due to the loss of Hargreaves. You are happy to leave your opinion right there because it suits you. That's how you hide behind the media, backing up your stance with what they say for the most.

In terms of potential ability, I'd happily say that Mascherano looks like he has a better career ahead of him. He's established in a better international team and doesn't have the stigma hanging over him of being a bit-part player. He also benefits from being the best in his position at his current club. Fletcher doesn't have the luxury as a fit Hargreaves (does such a beast exist?) will surely replace him in the side if/when he returns. I have massive reservations over his all round game. As much as it's easy to hide behind the fact that he's seen as a destructive midfielder thus his attacking outlet doesn't matter, that's not at all true. Football is a different beast now, players need more to their game. A holding midfielder shouldn't be so limited as Mascherano is going forward; this covers both his vision in reading the attacking side of the game and also his technical ability to operate there.

If you believe this doesn't matter so much, fair enough. I wouldn't be happy to carry such a player in my side. If you think I'm understating his ability, then I suggest you watch him more. He relies so much on his athleticism, it's almost alarming.

I've long said that a massive problem for Liverpool has been the style in which they attack. They rely so heavily on individuals, the system can't cope without them. Gerrard, Torres, Alonso. Going without these players who can continually add attacking flair to the game causes long term problems for Liverpool. Players like Lucas and Mascherano can't add this. Players like Keane and Vieira, true greats in the game, scored goals and were attacking outlets. Mascherano doesn't and until he does, he won't be on top of his game or world class imo. Not for Liverpool anyway. At Barca, he'd be much more suited to their style. They have many more attacking options, so his destructive style would probably be enough. Think of Makelele at Chelsea and Real Madrid. He thrived because he had so many good attacking players in front of him. Robben, Joe Cole, Lampard, Duff and then the Real Galacticos in the likes of Figo et al.

So yea. Mascherano. One of the best man markers around, great tackler and very atheltic. The kind of player who plays with real passion and so fans love. Like Tevez at United. And my opinions on him have shown that passion isn't enough when your overall game is lacking, I wanted him out from very early.


-------

So, am I just being biased? I don't think so. I know what I see on the pitch and over the last two seasons, especially the one just finished, Fletcher has been superb and Mascherano hasn't played to the same standard. Forget reputation. Players improve and get worse and I'll judge them on what they've done recently, not a mass of media spin that is given an indefinite Use By date.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hmmm, I'm not sure, I definitely think Fletcher is more useful to United though. He was probably a better player than Mascherano last season, but not the last two years I think. But yeah I don't think he'll ever get Mascherano's plaudits because he's not foreign.

Anonymous said...

U r right, fletcher is better than masc. I even believe that if he played the final, man utd would have won it

Anonymous said...

its like suggesting tevez is better than ronaldo! oh I forgot they dont play for you anymore! masch makes fletcher look like a blue square premier player

JOOTT said...

Very constructive there. You kept it relevant (Ronaldo etc) and factual (Blue Square). Mad props to you. Ah well, god loves a trier.

Unknown said...

I found it very difficult to hold in the laughter i experience when seen you was comparing The Argentina captain to Flecker.

Sorry.... HAHAHAHA you say the Scousers are duluded.

JOOTT said...

So reputation > performances?

If you're happy making that statement then more power to you.

Big D 16 said...

Ok to all you liverpool fans who want to say look at your club when your best player is fletcher..... Well Fletcher covers more ground...Fact....Makes more Tackles....Fact....Gets more assist....Fact....Score more goals...FACT!!! I will never say mascherano is poor, but in the last season fletcher was one of our better players, also to the liverpool fan who referred to Tevez and Ronaldo not playing for us, well thats true and its a big loss, BUT We didnt need Tevez anymore as his work rate made up for ronaldo's lack of!! Now has Rafa ever won the Premiership? NO!! come back to us when you can talk about real football and not the media hype around the clubs and players...

JOOTT said...

Tevez was crap though. Let's not attempt to polish a turd.

Anonymous said...

fletcher had a betta year then mascherano n was unlucky nt 2 play in the champions league final

Anonymous said...

The first few comments definatly need revising!!
I'm a united fan and I think Fletcher is rubbish!!
Mascherano is much better.
What can Fletcher do?
At least with Mascherano you can say he's a defensive midfielder with very little creativity (but not needed as someone else in midfield can do that for him)
You can't class Fletcher as anything. He's not got a great passing range, he's not the greatest tackler. He's a very average midfielder who gets carried by the rest of the team!!
Fletcher is a squad player and nothing more. Fletcher only scored 4 goals aswell last season and considering we need someone to replace Scholes who at his peak would get at least get 8 in all comps then can't see how Fletcher is so 'good'
As for Tevez he's just a greedy t**t as proved 'cos united offered 90k wages which the bin dippers wouldn't do and met his asking price.
The guy has really shown his true colours, all he and his agent (his master) want is more money!!!!

United will always be better than the bin dippers though, rest assured about that. Gerarrd is a top international bottler and the fat spanish waiter needs to pick a steady team...........then again the dippers can only dream